<aside> 🏛️ Personal review (non-legal) is an internal publication-safety pass, not legal advice, and not reviewed by a lawyer.
</aside>
<aside> ℹ️ This issues list is based on automated QA evaluation of the source answers. The personal review (non-legal) step sanitises wording for publication but does not re-score the answers.
</aside>
<aside> 🧾 Question:
To ask His Majesty's Government when they plan to publish a response to the ground rent consultation held in 2023.
</aside>
<aside> 🧾 Government Answer:
We will publish a response to the 2023 consultation in due course. The government published a policy statement alongside the draft Bill setting out the existing evidence and considerations of different policy options.
</aside>
<aside> 🧾 Rubric Assessment:
Status: Needs improvement Reason: Answer is vague with no clear timeline, lacking specificity and transparency. Priority: medium
</aside>
<aside> 🧾 Question:
To ask His Majesty's Government, in regard to the Freedom from violence and abuse volume 2: action plan, published on 18 December 2025, what is the timetable for the cross-departmental team's examination of the recommendations of Baroness Bertin's Independent Pornography Review.
</aside>
<aside> 🧾 Government Answer:
To address the recommendations of Baroness Bertin’s Review, in December 2025 government announced through the ‘Freedom from Violence and Abuse’ strategy, the creation of a cross-government joint team, to rigorously examine the evidence to inform the government’s approach to pornography policy. The team began work in December 2025, and is formed of the Home Office, Department for Science, Innovation and Technology, Ministry of Justice and Department for Culture, Media and Sport.
</aside>
<aside> 🧾 Rubric Assessment:
Status: Needs improvement Reason: No timetable or detailed milestones provided, answer lacks clarity and specificity. Priority: medium
</aside>