<aside> 🏛️ Personal review (non-legal) is an internal publication-safety pass, not legal advice, and not reviewed by a lawyer.
</aside>
<aside> ℹ️ This issues list is based on automated QA evaluation of the source answers. The personal review (non-legal) step sanitises wording for publication but does not re-score the answers.
</aside>
<aside> 🧾 Question:
To ask His Majesty's Government when they plan to publish a response to the ground rent consultation held in 2023.
</aside>
<aside> 🧾 Government Answer:
We will publish a response to the 2023 consultation in due course. The government published a policy statement alongside the draft Bill setting out the existing evidence and considerations of different policy options.
</aside>
<aside> 🧾 Rubric Assessment:
Status: Needs improvement Reason: Answer lacks a specific timeline and substantive information on the publication plans, providing only a vague future intention. Priority: high
</aside>
<aside> 🧾 Question:
To ask His Majesty's Government whether they plan to encourage a reduction in remote working as part of their growth strategy.
</aside>
<aside> 🧾 Government Answer:
Flexible working can lead to happier, healthier and more productive employees. This is good for workers and good for businesses. Businesses can reject requests for remote working on business grounds, set out in legislation, including high costs or limited ability to meet customer demand. Changes through the Employment Rights Act will encourage conversations between employers and employees about where flexibility might be possible. In 2025, we published our modern Industrial Strategy which will support creating good jobs and higher incomes across the country, including £1.2 billion of additional investment in skills per year by 2028-29.
</aside>
<aside> 🧾 Rubric Assessment:
Status: Needs improvement Reason: Answer fails to directly address whether the government plans to reduce remote working, instead offering generalized positive statements on flexible working. Priority: high
</aside>